Allowed

Harshal Ramesh Gavit v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Feb 2015WP/792/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition directed the State Government to take a decision on a proposal for prior approval under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code within three months. The Court also directed timely communication of the decision to the District Collector for further processing.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the State Government to decide the proposal within three months and the District Collector to pass an order within one month thereafter.

Harshal Ramesh Gavit Vs the State of Maharashtra through… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

wp-792.15.doc

¶2

pmw

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.792 OF 2015

¶5

Harshal Ramesh Gavit Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

¶8

Respondents

¶9

Mr. Suresh M. Sabrad, for Petitioner. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP, for Respondents.

¶10

CORAM: A.S.OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.

¶11

DATE: 9^th FEBRUARY, 2015

¶12

P.C.:

¶13

Not on board. Taken on board.

¶14

. The learned AGP does not dispute that the matter is

¶15

pending before the State Government for taking appropriate decision on the proposal of the Petitioner for grant of prior approval under Clause (b) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 36A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. In view of what is held by this Court in Judgment and Order dated 10^th October, 2014 in Writ Petition No.8744 of 2014 and other connected Petitions, appropriate decision will have to be taken by the State Government within a period of three months from today. For the reasons recorded in the said Judgment and Order, we pass the following order :-

1 of 2

wp-792.15.doc

ORDER

(i) The State Government shall take appropriate decision on the proposal of the petitioner pending for grant of prior approval under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 36A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code,1966, as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within a period of three months from today;

¶20

(ii) The order passed by the State Government on the said proposal shall be forthwith communicated to the District Collector within a period of one week from the date of passing the order;

¶21

(iii) After receiving the communication of the orders from the State Government, the District Collector shall pass order on the application in accordance with law preferably within a period of one month from the date on which the order of the State Government are communicated to him;

¶22

(iv) We dispose of the Petition in terms of the above directions.

¶23

(A.K. MENON, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)

¶24

2 of 2

Harshal Ramesh Gavit v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harshal Ramesh Gavit v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yusuf Shanullah Shaikh and 37 Ors. Vs Chief Officer -Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Board and 4 Ors.

Samudra Mahal Premises Co-Operative Society Ltd. Vs Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management and 6 Ors.

Shri. Ramesh Balwant Dhage Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Addl. Collector and Ors.

Govind Abhaji Kaspate and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shri. Kiran Patilbuva More and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

Shri. Dattatray Shankar Lagad and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.