Disposed

Dilip Subhash Patole v. the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Mar 2015WP/7744/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a contract-based Junior Engineer, challenged his 2013 termination and non-payment of salary. The bench declined to interfere with the termination but directed the Zilla Parishad if salary for the last month was not paid.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit representation to Zilla Parishad for unpaid salary for the last month; termination not interfered with.

Dilip Subhash Patole Vs the Chief Executive Officer… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

wp7744.14.sxw

¶2

1/2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 7744 OF 2014

¶5

Dilip Subhash Patole V/s.	...	Petitioner
The Chief Executive Officer & ors.	...	Respondents

¶6

Mr. A.R. Gole for the petitioner.

¶7

CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.S. GADKARI, JJ .

¶8

9^th March, 2015.

¶9

P.C.

¶10

It is submitted that the petitioner was appointed on contract basis

¶11

as a Junior Engineer. By communication dated 30^th April, 2013 the petitioner's contract was terminated. It is submitted that last performance report was signed by the person who was not competent to sign. Petitioner was not paid salary for last month though work was extracted from him in the month of April 2013.

¶12

We have perused the record. The petitioner was appointed on contract basis. He was terminated in the year 2013. We are not inclined to interfere into the matter. However, in case petitioner is not paid salary

¶13

wp7744.14.sxw

¶14

2/2

¶15

for the last month, he is entitled to submit the comprehensive representation to the Zilla Parishad. With aforesaid observations, Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶16

(A.S. GADKARI, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)

¶17

L.S. Panjwani, P.S.

Dilip Subhash Patole v. the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip Subhash Patole v. the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Mahesh S/O. Hambirrao Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra through Directorate of Economics and Statistics and Ors.

Bhagwan Mahadeo Hirdekar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shri Mahesh S/O. Hambirrao Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra through Directorate of Economics and Statistics and Ors.

Shri. Balkrishna alias Baba Tukaram Shinde and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Transport Dept and Anr.

The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors. Vs Shri. Nitin Vasant Parale and Ors.

Dilip Subhash Patole Vs the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur and Ors.