Petitioner challenged non-renewal of expired auto rickshaw permits by the Regional Transport Authority. The court observed that authorities must act under applicable acts and rules and disposed of the writ petition with this observation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp7556.14.sxw
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7556 OF 2014
Shri Balkrishna (alias Baba) Tukaram Shinde & ors. ... Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra & anr. ... Respondents
Mr. R.S. Bhalerao for the petitioners. Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for respondents 1 and 2.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.S. GADKARI, JJ . 9th March, 2015.
P.C.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2. Petitioner's grievance is that respondent authority is not renewing permit licenses of auto rickshaw after expiry of the same.
3. Respondents 1 and 2 have filed affidavit-in-reply. The deponent
Anil Sakharam Patil contends that 1355 permits have been renewed by
the Regional Transport Authority, Pune. 47 applications of late renewal
permits were filed for special reasons like bed ridden permit holders,
2/2 wp7556.14.sxw
death of permit holders, widows of permit holders and missing cases of permit holders. Such applications were also considered on humanitarian grounds and the permits were renewed.
(A.S. GADKARI, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent authority is renewing permit licenses of auto rickshaws after expiry of the same.
Shri Balkrishna (alias Baba) Tukaram Shinde & ors.
State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
A.S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
