The Court transferred a Writ Petition under Article 226 to the original side as the entire cause of action arose in Mumbai, enabling the in-person petitioner to amend the petition consequentially.
Order Transfer of Writ Petition to Original Side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp7146-14
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7146 OF 2014
Landlord Kanchan Madhusudan V/s. Asstt. Engineer 'D' Ward, Building and Factory
..Petitioner.
..Respondent.
Landlord Kanchan Madhusudan - the petitioner in person. None for respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND A.K. MENON, JJ. DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2015
P.C. :-
The entire cause of action for filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has arisen in Mumbai. We accordingly transfer the petition to the original side. The petitioner appearing in person to carry out consequential amendment.
(A.K.MENON, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether thePetition need tobe transferred to the original side court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kanchan Madhusudan
Asstt. Engineer 'D' Ward, Building and Factory
A.S. Oka
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
