Allowed

Pancard Clubs Limited and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC16 Jan 2015CAW/110/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition at the pre-admission stage, the court rejected prayer (a) and allowed prayer (b) for amendment of the petition, directing the applicants to carry out the amendment within one week and to issue a notice to the Advocate General.

What did the court decide?

Civil application allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) for amendment; amendment to be carried out within one week.

Pancard Clubs Limited and Anr. Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2015)

caw110

ssp

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.110 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.11513 OF 2014

¶7

Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders

¶8

Mr.G.S.Godbole i/b Mr.V.P.Patil for the Applicants
Ms M.P.Thakur, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1-A to 1-C
and 1-E.

¶9

CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.K.MENON,JJ.

¶10

DATE : JANUARY 16, 2015.

¶11

P.C.

¶12

.Not on board. Taken on board.

¶13

1Heard the learned counsel for the
applicants and the learned AGP for the
respondent Nos.1A to 1C and 1E. The
learned counsel for the applicants states
that he is not pressing the prayer (a).
Hence, the prayer is rejected. However, if

¶14

rule in terms of the amended petition is
issued, a notice will have to be issued to
the learned Advocate General. The Writ
Petition is at pre-admission stage. Hence,
we allow the civil application in terms of
prayer clause (b). Amendment to be carried
out within a period of one week from today.

Pancard Clubs Limited and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pancard Clubs Limited and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ananda Dattatrya Patil and Ors. Vs Union of India, through Ministry of Finance and Ors.

Ganesh Dhondu Gurav Vs Suman Ganesh Gurav

Bharat Adivarekar Vs Yamini Adivarekar

Pancard Clubs Limited and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Tukaram Sudhakar Zaware Vs Sangeeta Tukaram Zaware

Sanjay Babuamal Singhi Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Principal Secretary to the Ministry of Revenue and Anr.