Single bench directed respondents to consider petitioner's representations in light of earlier communications and observations within four months. Petition disposed of without costs.
Respondents directed to consider representations within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 1
923wp7010.14.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7010 OF 2014
Chandrakant Kisan Pardhi
….Petitioner.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….Respondents.
Mr. C.R. Sadasivam i/by N.M. Ganguli for the Petitioner. Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND C.V. BHADANG, JJ. DATE : 15th JANUARY 2015.
P.C.:
Heard.
The learned counsel for the parties state that the issue involved in this case stands answered by the order dated 14.8.2013 in Writ Petition No. 5728 of 2013 (Shri Mohan Sakharam Unde & Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.) . It is stated that in similar set of facts, the Aurangabad Bench of this Court had directed in Writ Petition No. 7116 of 2011 (Seema D/o. Khandu Takale Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.) the Respondents to consider the representation made by the Petitioner in that case, in the light of the communication dated 24.4.2007 and the observations made in the Judgment and order dated 24.4.2012. The learned counsel state that a similar order could be passed in this case also.
1/2
ssm 2 923wp7010.14.sxw Hence, we direct the Respondents to consider the
representations made by the Petitioners on 11.10.2013 and/or 4.1.2014 in the light of the communication dated 24.4.2007 and the observations made by this Court in the Judgment and order dated 24.4.2012, within a period of four months. Order accordingly.
Writ Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms, with no
order as to costs.
(C.V. BHADANG, J.) (VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
2/2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shri Mohan Sakharam Unde & Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.Referred¶13
Writ Petition No. 5728 of 2013
Seema D/o. Khandu Takale Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.Referred¶13
Writ Petition No. 7116 of 2011
Chandrakant Kisan Pardhi
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Vasanti A. Naik
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
