conditions of the advertisement requiring the aspirants to have three years experience cannot be said to be against the provisions of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 (for short, 'Rules of 1981'). The learned Counsel submitted that the rules prescribed the minimum qualification and eligibility and cannot derogate from any additional condition as prescribed, if the same is found to be with the objective of scouting for the best talent in order to improve the quality of education being imparted in the school. In short, it is submitted that there is no prohibition which can be read into the Rules of 1981 which would preclude the management from prescribing any condition as to eligibility which may be in furtherance of the objective of improvement of the quality of the education being imparted. The learned Counsel submitted that thus, the advertisement in pursuance of which the petitioners came to be appointed which prescribe the aspirant to have a minimum experience of three years would not render the advertisement to be defective and in that view of the matter, the impugned order which proceeds solely on the ground of the advertisement being defective for prescribing the experience of 3 years, cannot be sustained.
