This order dismisses two writ petitions seeking quashing of an FIR by consent, holding them unmaintainable as the parties had previously withdrawn similar petitions after the court declined to quash due to antecedents.
Writ petitions were dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP626&627_15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.626 OF 2015
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.627 OF 2015
Dharmesh @ Nannu Nitinbhai Shah and another Vs. State of Maharashtra and another
… Petitioners … Respondents
Mr. P. M. Patil for Petitioners. Mr. K. V. Saste for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM :RANJIT MORE & R. G. KETKAR, JJ. DATE :03rd SEPTEMBER, 2015.
PC:
Heard Mr. Patil, learned Counsel for petitioners and Mr. Saste, learned Counsel for respondent No.1-State.
[R. G. KETKAR, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
Minal Parab
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether present writ petitions seeking quashing of FIR by consent are maintainable after withdrawal of earlier petitions.
Dharmesh @ Nannu Nitinbhai Shah and another
State of Maharashtra and another
RANJIT MORE
R. G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
