The court restored Writ Petition No.3607 of 2013 on the file by condoning the delay in filing the current criminal application for restoration, accepting the counsel's undertaking to remove office objections within two weeks.
Restoration of Writ Petition No.3607 of 2013 on the file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
917-APPW-76-2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.76 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.3607 OF 2013
Ashokkumar Ratilal Kansara ..Petitioner/Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents.
Ms. Kainaz Irani i/by Das Associates, advocate for petitioner/applicant. Mrs. M.M.Deshmukh, APP for the State.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. Date : 2nd September, 2015 .
P. C. :
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the
learned APP for the State.
2 This application is taken out for restoration of the Writ
Petition No.3607 of 2013.
3 The said writ petition was placed for 'Orders' before the Registrar (Judicial-I) on 17.10.2013 and the applicant/petitioner
Shivgan 1/2
917-APPW-76-2014.doc
was directed to remove office objections within four weeks failing which the petition was to stand dismissed automatically. This order was not complied with by the applicant-petitioner and , therefore, the said writ petition stood dismissed.
4 The learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner makes a statement that she will remove office objections within a period of two weeks from today. Statement accepted.
5 The learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner has also explained the delay occurred in filing this application. Explanation, in our view, is satisfactory. In the circumstances, we restore the Writ Petition No.3607 of 2013 on the file after condoning the delay occurred in filing this application.
6 Application is, accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer
clause ( a).
[R.G.KETKAR, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
2/2
Shivgan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow restoration of Writ Petition No.3607 of 2013 on condition of removing office objections.
Ashokkumar Ratilal Kansara
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
