Court disposed of a criminal writ petition after personally interviewing the girl-parties. The court found the daughter was residing with the respondent out of free will and wished to speak to her mother, rendering further orders unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
2810cwp569.15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 569 OF 2015
(Panju Kisanchand Totwani Vs. Shashank Rushikumar Chandrakar & the State)
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND P. B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : 28 OCTOBER, 2015
In pursuance of the notice issued by this Court, respondent No.1 along with Neha, daughter of the petitioner, are present in the Court.
We have personally interviewed the girl-Neha in the Chamber. She has informed us that she has married with respondent No.1-Shashank and she is residing with him out of her free will and wish.
We have also permitted the said girl-Neha to speak with her mother.
In that view of the matter, no orders are necessary to be passed in the present matter.
The petition is disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE
wwl
Panju Kisanchand Totwani
Shashank Rushikumar Chandrakar
The State
B. R. Gavai
P. B. Varale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
