In this criminal writ petition, the petitioner challenged his arrest for violating parole conditions. Relying on two Division Bench precedents, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, rejected the petition and upheld the arrest order.
Petition rejected; fees quantified at Rs. 1,500/-.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
2810cwp729.15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 729 OF 2015
(Dipak Suresh Shende Vs. The D.I.G. Prison (E)(R), Nagpur & another)
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND P. B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : 28 OCTOBER, 2015
The petitioner was required to be arrested on earlier occasions/s when he was released on parole/furlough.
In view of the judgments of the two Division Benches of this Court in the case of Murlidhar Ramchandra Bhalerao Vs. State of Maharashtra and another reported in 2011 ALL MR (Cri) 2132 and Ramchandra Raghu Naik Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 2005 ALL MR (Cri) 1919 , the petition deserves to be rejected.
The petition is, therefore, rejected. Fees payable to the learned Counsel appointed to appear on behalf of the petitioner are quantified at Rs.1,500/-.
JUDGE JUDGE
wwl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner deserves arrest for violating parole conditions.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Murlidhar Ramchandra Bhalerao Vs. State of Maharashtra and anotherReferred¶9
2011 ALL MR (Cri) 2132
Ramchandra Raghu Naik Vs. State of MaharashtraReferred¶9
2005 ALL MR (Cri) 1919
Dipak Suresh Shende
The D.I.G. Prison (E)(R), Nagpur
State
B. R. Gavai
P. B. Varale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
