The writ petition was dismissed in default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner, following a previous order warning of dismissal for failure to work out the matter on earlier dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp5469-14
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5469 OF 2014
JAYWANTRAO VENKATRAO PATIL VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr.K.G.Patil, AGP for State Mr.V.D.Gunale,Adv. for R.3.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & V. L.ACHLIYA, JJ. DATED : 23rd FERUARY, 2015
P.C. :-
On 3/2/2015 this Court had passed the following order :
"The learned counsel for petitioner is absent. Since many dates the matter is not worked out. On the next date, the Court will be constrained to dismiss the matter. S.O. for 23/2/2015."
2] Today also when the matter is called out, none appears for the petitioner. In light of that, Petition stands dismissed in default. No costs.
V.L.ACHLIYA, J.
S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.
umg/
Jaywantrao Venkatrao Patil
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
V. L. Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
