Allowed

Sandip Pralhad Wagh v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Feb 2015WP/523/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad, in Writ Petition No. 523 of 2013, addressed the petitioner's challenge against a termination show cause notice issued pending validation of a tribe claim. The court ordered the respondent committee to decide the validation within six months, required the petitioner to cooperate and appear by March 10, 2015, and quashed the notice.

What did the court decide?

The impugned show cause notice is quashed and set aside. The petitioner shall not face adverse action on grounds of pending validation proceedings.

Sandip Pralhad Wagh Vs the State of Mah and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

wp523-13

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 523 OF 2013

¶5

SANDIP PRALHAD WAGH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

¶6

Advocate for Petitioners : Shirrurkar K T AGP for Respondents: Mr.A.S.Shinde Mr.Goyanka M.K. For R/3 Mr.Patil Pravin S. For R/2

¶7

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & V. L.ACHLIYA, JJ. DATED : 23rd FERUARY, 2015

¶8

P.C. :-

¶9

Mr. Shirurkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the validation proceeding in respect of tribe claim of the petitioner is pending with the respondent committee. Inpite of the fact that the said proceedings are pending, the employer has issued show cause notice regarding termination of service. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner is ready to cooperate in expeditious disposal of the validation proceedings and his services be protected. Mr.Patil, learned counsel for respondent committee submits that since one year the matter is pending for hearing but it is the petitioner who is not cooperating in expeditious disposal of the proceeding.

¶10

wp523-13

¶11

-2-

¶12

2] Mr.Goyanka, learned counsel for the employer submits that as the validity certificate is not submitted and petitioner is appointed from the reserved category, show cause notice has been rightly issued.

¶13

3] To get the proceeding decided within stipulated period is not in the hands of litigant, ofcourse, litigant also has to cooperate in expeditious disposal of the proceeding. This Court has already granted stay to the said show cause notice vide order dated 18/1/2013. In light of that, we pass following order :

¶14

a] Respondent committee shall decide validation proceeding in respect of tribe claim of the petitioner expeditiously preferably within six months.

¶15

b] Petitioner shall appear before the committee on 10/3/2015. Petitioner shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the said proceeding.

¶16

c] The impugned show cause notice is quashed and set aside. The employer shall not take any adverse action against the petitioner only on the ground that validation proceedings are pending. However, the employer is entitled to proceed in tune with the judgment delivered by the committee in the validation proceeding.

¶17

wp523-13

¶18

-3-

¶19

4] The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶20

V.L.ACHLIYA, J.

¶21

S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.

¶22

umg/

Sandip Pralhad Wagh v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandip Pralhad Wagh v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Taslim Kausar Irfan Khan Pathan @ Taslim Kausar Nazirkhan Pathan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Prajakta Prabhu Survase Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ashish Subhash Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Balkrishna Govindrao Kulkarni Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Chunnekhan Rajekhan Pathan Vs the Liquidator District Deputy Registrar Cooperative Society, Aurangabad and Another

Jaywantrao Venkatrao Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others