Petitioner sought direction to pay retiral dues. Court accepted respondent's undertaking regarding payment within four weeks and disposed of the petition.
Accepted respondent's undertaking to pay retiral dues within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.5427/2014
Sukhdeo son of Barikarao Jambulkar ...Versus...
The Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Ramtek, Tah. Ramtek, District Nagpur and another
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri A. Shelat, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.A. Sahu, Advocate for respondent no.1 Shri D.P. Thakare, AGP for respondent no.2
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 09.04.2015
By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent no.1 to pay the retiral dues of the petitioner.
The respondent no.1 has filed an affidavit-in-reply and stated therein that the State Government has released the grants and the retiral dues would be paid to the petitioner as early as possible and positively within a period of four weeks.
We dispose of the writ petition by accepting the statement made on behalf of the respondent no.1, which would be binding on it. No order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Wadkar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the authority should direct the respondent to pay the petitioner's retiral dues when the State Government has released the grants?
Sukhdeo son of Barikarao Jambulkar
The Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Ramtek
another
VASANTI A. NAIK
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
