The High Court of Nagpur allowed the petitioner to withdraw Writ Petition No. 2104 of 2014 as disputes of facts compelled withdrawal. All points were left open.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
wp2104.1 4
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 2104 OF 2014
Narendra Shrawanji Dhundhase
-vs-
State of Maharashtra and others
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr.B.W.Patil, counsel for the petitioner.
Mr.S.M.Ghodeswar, AGP for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & A.M.BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 08.04.2015.
Since several disputed questions of facts arise for determination in this writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would take up appropriate proceedings and he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition.
In view of the aforesaid, we permit the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
The points raised in the petition are kept open.
JUDGE JUDGE
KHUNTE
Narendra Shrawanji Dhundhase
State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
