Petitioner's counsel stated the matter was amicably settled. The writ petition was disposed of without any substantive adjudication or relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP54-15.odt
`
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No. 54/2015
(Monty s/o Nagarmal Sharma .vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. )
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. S.K. Kotwal, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. M. Pathan, AGP for Respondents 1 to 4.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar, JJ. DATED : February 23, 2015.
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has already been amicably settled and as such he does not press the petition. Writ petition is disposed of as such.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
Monty s/o Nagarmal Sharma
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
