Civil Application rejected without merits. Appointment procedure for Registrar post held subject to result of pending Writ Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.02.caw.138.15.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 138 / 2015
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2258/2008 (Moreshwar Sitaramji Raut vs, The Hon’ble Principal District and Sessions Judge Nagpur and others vs. Applicants intervenors)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. H.D.Dangre,Adv.for applicant/petitioner Mr.Anand Jaiswal Sr.Counsel respondents 1 and 2 Mr.Anup Dhore Adv.for Intervenors
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & Mrs. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 20th February, 2015.
Heard.
The relief as claimed in the Civil Application cannot be granted without hearing the Writ Petition finally. Civil Application is therefore, rejected.
Needless to state that the process for promotion/nomination for filling up the post of Registrar shall proceed in accordance with law. However, the same shall be subject to result of the present Petition.
JUDGEJUDGE
sahare
Moreshwar Sitaramji Raut
Hon'ble Principal District and Sessions Judge Nagpur
Applicants intervenors
B.R. Gavai
Mridula Bhatakhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court