The petition challenging Second Appeals before the CICT was disposed of as the respondent expressed no desire to prosecute said appeals, directing the CICT not to proceed.
Second Respondent directed not to proceed with the appeals subject matter of the Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-5266.14
1
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5266 OF 2014
The Public Information Officer/Dy. Registrar
… Petitioner
Vs.
The Central Information Commission and Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Makarand Subhash Karnik, for the Petitioner. Mr. Sunil Kishore Ahya, for the Respondent No.2 in person.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : 8th JANUARY, 2015
P.C.
. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and
the second Respondent appearing in person. Though original affidavit filed by the second Respondent is not on record, a copy is produced for perusal of the Court. In paragraph 5 of the affidavit, the second Respondent has stated that in view of the orders passed by the State Information Commissioner, the Public Information Officer of this Court has provided relevant and requisite information to the second Respondent and, therefore, he does not want to prosecute the Second Appeals pending before the Central Information Commission.
1 of 2
2 wp-5266.14
2 of 2
The Public Information Officer/Dy. Registrar
The Central Information Commission
Second Respondent
A.S. OKA
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
