High Court on Its Own Motion v. the State of Maharashtra and 8 Ors. and Akshay Vani and Anr. (Applicants)
Case brief
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
cs-107.14
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.107 OF 2014 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.71 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Kamal Khata i/by Sutapa Saha for the Applicant in Chamber Summons. Ms. Geeta Shastri, Additional Government Pleader for Respondent State. Shri A.M. Sethna for Union of India. Shri A.A. Garge for Respondent No.5. Ms. Pooja Singh i/by Shri N.R. Bubna for Respondent No.6. Ms. K.R. Punjabi for BMC.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K MENON, JJ DATED : 7TH JANUARY 2015
P.C.:
. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. In view of the averments made in the affidavit-
in-support of the Chamber Summons, we make the Chamber Summons absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(A.K.MENON, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
Shri Kamal Khata i/ Sutapa Saha
Respondent State
Union of India
Respondent No.5
Respondent No.6
BMC
A.S. OKA
A.K MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court