Writ petitions were dismissed in default due to non-appearance of petitioners or their LRs. Possession had been taken decades ago. Rule discharged and applications disposed of.
Dismissed in default; Rule discharged; No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5224 OF 1999 WITH
C.A.NO.1511 OF 2006 C.A.NO.8096 OF 2005
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.S.H.Joshi, advocate for the petitioners absent. Mrs.Y.M.Kshirsagar, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State.
Mr.V.R.Sonwalkar, advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & A.I.S.CHEEMA,JJ. Date : 30.03.2015. PER COURT :
2
paise two only) towards compensation to the Tahsil Office.
No costs.
(A.I.S.CHEEMA,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt..30.03.2015. asp/office/wp5224.99
S.V. Gangapurwala
A.I. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
