The writ petition, filed challenging regularization issues, was disposed of as withdrawn after the petitioner was granted approval and regularized during its pendency.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn; Civil Application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.220 OF 2003 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9516 OF 2004
(Uttam s/o Raosaheb Kande Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors.)
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri J.M. Murkute, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.G. Sangle, A.G.P. for State
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATED : 27th March, 2015.
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
fmp/wp220.03
Uttam s/o Raosaheb Kande
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
