Criminal Application withdrawn by applicant; dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal issues addressed.
Criminal application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
7 sr. no..odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 51 OF 2015
UMAKANT S/O ATMARAM SAPKAR AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Prakashsing B. Patil APP for Respondent/ State : Mr. S.G. Nandedkar
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 13TH JANUARY, 2015.
PER COURT:
1] After arguing the application for sometime, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions of the applicant No.1, who is present in the court, seeks liberty to withdraw the application. Criminal application is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
[A.M. BADAR] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
Umakant S/O Atmaram Sapkar and another
The State of Maharashtra and others
S.S. Shinde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
