Petitioners sought leave to withdraw their writ petition before the High Court at Aurangabad. The court granted the leave to withdraw, and consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp4849.11.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4849 OF 2011
Rameshwer s/o Gangakishan Daga & another .. PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. S.G. Jadhavar, advocate for petitioners. Mr. G.R. Ingole, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & P. R. BORA, JJ. DATE : 6th JANUARY, 2015.
PER COURT :
( P. R. BORA ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Rameshwer s/o Gangakishan Daga
另一个
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
P. R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
