High Court dismissed the writ petition contesting unauthorized construction by a neighbor, holding the petitioner could avail of an adequate alternate remedy and did not invoke the court's extraordinary jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp11965.14.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 11965 OF 2014
Gokul s/o Pandurang Kale .. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & another .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. B.S. Chondhekar, advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.K. Kadam, AGP for the State.
===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE & P. R. BORA, JJ. DATE : 6th JANUARY, 2015.
PER COURT :
be entertained. Writ petition stands dismissed keeping the option to avail of alternate remedy open for the petitioner.
( P. R. BORA ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition concerning unauthorized construction is maintainable when an adequate alternate legal remedy is available.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gokul s/o Pandurang Kale
The State of Maharashtra
another
R.M. Borde
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
