The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted leave and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 WRIT PETITION NO. 4757 OF 2014
BALAJI RAMBHAU SALUNKE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Venjane Tukaram M. AGP for RespondentS State : Mr. N.B. Patil Advocate for Respondents No. 4 : Mr. Dahiphale, H/f. Mr. N P Patil
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: October 07, 2015
PER COURT :-
agp/-
BALAJI RAMBHAU SALUNKE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDE
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
