Writ petition challenging denial of crop damage aid rejected as raising disputed factual questions and devoid of substance, with no entitlement to writ of mandamus.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
7 WRIT PETITION NO. 2050 OF 2015
JAGANNATH NIVRUTTI BHUSARE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.Bagal Suraj R. AGP for Respondent State: Mr.N.B.Patil
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: October 07, 2015
PER COURT :-
We do not propose to entertain the writ petition. The petition is devoid of substance and stands rejected.
( P.R. BORA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
agp/-
JAGANNATH NIVRUTTI BHUSARE AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
R. M. BORDE
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
