Petitioner withdrew Criminal Writ Petition. Court dismissed the Petition as withdrawn, leaving contentions open for trial Court.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; contentions left open for trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGBAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 456 OF 2014
SWAPNIL PURUSHOTTAM PATHAK VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Deshmukh Raghuraj V. APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.G. Nandedkar
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. Dated: January 06, 2015
PER COURT :-
After arguing the Petition for some time, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the Petition.
( A.M. BADAR, J. )
( S.S. SHINDE, J. )
sga/-
SWAPNIL PURUSHOTTAM PATHAK
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
