The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench allowed Criminal Appeal No. 2015. Respondents waived notice service. Court ordered action irrespective of acquittal motive under Section 390 CrPC 1973.
Action under Section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to follow against respondent nos. 1 to 4 (original accused).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) Cri. Appeal (from Appln. No.3414 of 2014)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Criminal Appeal No. of 2015
The State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station, Ausa, .. Appellant District : Latur. (Original complainant)
versus
Annasaheb Ramrao Patil & .. Respondent 3 others. (Original accused)
Mr. S.G. Karlekar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the appellant - State.
Mr. S.P. Urgunde, Advocate, for respondent nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 5TH JANUARY 2015
PER COURT :
Cri. Appeal (from Appln. No.3414 of 2014)
respondent nos.1 to 4 (original accused) upon admission of the appeal.
( A.M. BADAR ) ( S.S. SHINDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
puranik / CriApeal (from Appln3414.14)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station, Ausa
Annasaheb Ramrao Patil & 3 others
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
