High Court Bench disposed of Writ Petition No. 4427 of 2007 as academic, noting that earlier prayers had lapsed over time. No substantive adjudication occurred on legal propositions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ash
wp-4427.07
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4427 OF 2007
Sindhu Sadashiv Arane @ Rekha Hiraman Shinde .. Petitioner Vs The Government of Maharashtra and Others. .. Respondents
Shri S.M. Gorwadkar for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the State. Shri Abhijit P. Kulkarni for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K.MENON, JJ DATED : 29TH JANUARY 2015
P.C.
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. We
have perused the prayers in the Petition. As far as the prayer clauses (b) and (c) are concerned, with the passage of time, both the prayers will not survive.
ash
wp-4427.07
2
nature of the aforesaid judgment and order is concerned, it is not necessary for us to adjudicate upon the said issue.
of.
(A.K.MENON, J) ( A.S. OKA, J )
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dadasaheb Arjun Gulve V. State of Maharashtra and Others [2008(2) BCR 712)Referred¶11
Sindhu Sadashiv Arane @ Rekha Hiraman Shinde
The Government of Maharashtra
A.S. OKA
A.K.MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
