Disposed

Gajendra Vitthaldas Khedekar v. the State of Maharashtra and 9 Ors.

Bombay HC29 Jan 2015NMW/350/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed a Notice of Motion as withdrawn, granting liberty to file appropriate proceedings. The court expressly clarified that it made no adjudication on the merits of the prayers or the appropriate forum to hear them.

What did the court decide?

Notice of Motion dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceeding.

Gajendra Vitthaldas Khedekar Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

NM-350.14

¶3

ash

¶4

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.350 OF 2014 IN

¶6

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.88 OF 2010

¶7

Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.

¶8

Shri Uday Warunjikar along with Shri S.P. Munghate for the Applicant/Org. Petitioner. Shri J.S. Saluja, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 5 and 7. Shri V.M. Parshurami for Respondent No.6.

¶9

CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K.MENON, JJ DATED : 29TH JANUARY 2015

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner on instructions of the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Notice of Motion with liberty to file an appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. The Notice of Motion is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. We, however, make it clear that we have not made any adjudication on the question whether all the prayers made in the Notice of Motion can be granted by the appropriate forum or appropriate authority. All contentions in that behalf are kept open.

Gajendra Vitthaldas Khedekar v. the State of Maharashtra and 9 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gajendra Vitthaldas Khedekar v. the State of Maharashtra and 9 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajinath Laxman Shinde Vs the District Rehabilitation Offic and Ors.

M/S. Gurudaya Builders, through Its Partners Vs Shri Manukumar Shrivastav, the Principal Secretary and Anr.

Shri Tukaram Sakharam Lad Vs Shri Rajaram Mane, Collector and Eputy Director for Rehabilitation and Ors.

Narhari Sitaram Jirval Vs Shri. Bhanudas H. Palve and Ors.

Sindhu Sadashiv Arane @ Rekha Hiraman Shinde Vs the Government of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sunil Lalu Gogale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.