The court dismissed the criminal writ petition when the petitioner applied to withdraw it following a review of a government affidavit. The accompanying application to produce documents was also disposed of.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; application for production of documents dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 43 OF 2014 WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 519 OF 2014
Jaberkhan Anwar Khan
....Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
....Respondents.
Mr. A.M. Karad, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, APP for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Khizar Patel, Advocate for respondent No. 4. Mr. S.P. Salgar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 5 & 6.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE & SMT. I.K. JAIN, JJ. DATED : 26th March, 2015.
ORDER :
[ SMT. I.K. JAIN, J. ] [ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ]
ssc/
Jaberkhan Anwar Khan
The State of Maharashtra
T.V. Nalawade
I.K. Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
