The High Court corrected clerical mistakes in a prior order that cited the wrong statute and application number, issuing a corrected writ and disposing of the matter.
Corrected writ was issued to rectify the order; motion disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Application 34/2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Application No.34 of 2015 In Criminal Appeal No.3 of 2015
Khandu s/o Jivraj Bhange. .. Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondent.
With
Criminal Application No.744 of 2015 In Criminal Appeal Stamp No.148 of 2015
Laxman S/o Subhash Bhange And Others.
.. Applicants.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondent.
Shri. S.P. Deshmukh, Advocate, for applicant.
Shri. K.S. Patil, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent.
CORAM: T.V. NALAWADE & Smt. I.K. JAIN, JJ. DATE : 25th MARCH 2015
2 Application 34/2015
:SPEAKING TO THE MINUTES :
Sd/- Sd/- (Smt. I.K. JAIN, J.) (T.V. NALAWADE, J. )
rsl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to correct clerical typos regarding the cited law and application number in the impugned order.
Khandu s/o Jivraj Bhange
Laxman S/o Subhash Bhange
The State of Maharashtra
T.V. NALAWADE
I.K. JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
