The court disposed of the writ petition without adjudication on merits, referencing an identical PIL where directions for removing encroachment were already issued to the Municipal Council.
Disposal of the writ petition and pending civil application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp427.15.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 427 OF 2015
Tausif Ahmed Sultan Ahmed
& others .. PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mrs. A.N. Ansari, advocate for petitioners. Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & V. K. JADHAV JJ. DATE : 17th APRIL, 2015.
PER COURT :
of.
( V.K. JADHAV ) JUDGE
dyb
Tausif Ahmed Sultan Ahmed & others
The State of Maharashtra & others
R.M. BORDE
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
