The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an order under section 56 of the Maharashtra Police Act, holding that the petitioner had an alternate efficacious remedy via appeal under section 60.
Writ petition dismissed with a direction to decide any appeal filed expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4132 OF 2015
Juber Chandulal Razvi. Versus
State of Maharashtra & Another.
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
Mr. Vikram Chavan for the Petitioner. Mr. K. V. Saste, learned APP for the State.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ. Date : December 1, 2015 .
P. C. :
2. Appeal, if filed, shall be decided expeditiously.
[V. L. ACHLIYA, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 1
patilsr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition must be dismissed as an efficacious remedy by way of appeal under section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act exists.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Juber Chandulal Razvi
State of Maharashtra
Another
Ranjit More
V. L. Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
