The High Court did not entertain a criminal application for quashing an FIR due to the applicant’s non-appearance despite repeated calls. The court dismissed the application.
Prayer for quashing of FIR dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 1238 OF 2015
Anupam B. Shrivastav. Versus
State of Maharashtra & Others.
..Applicant. ..Respondents.
None for the Applicant Mr. K. V. Saste, learned APP for the State.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ. Date : December 1, 2015 .
P. C. :
[V. L. ACHLIYA, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 1
patilsr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should entertain the prayer for quashing of the FIR when the applicant appeared without representation?.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anupam B. Shrivastav
State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
V. L. Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
