This judgment holds that revenue entries are for fiscal purposes and do not constitute evidence of title. The petitioner is directed to establish rights in a Civil Court; no interference in the Writ Petition is called for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4057 OF 2015
ASHOK SHRIDHAR PARATHE
VERSUS
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BEED AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr V.P. Savant GP for Respondents: Mr. D.R.Kale
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: April 13, 2015
PER COURT :-
Revenue entires are recorded merely for fiscal purposes and such entries in themselves do not constitute evidence of title of party in relation to the immovable property. Revenue entries can be corrected in accordance with determination of rights by the Civil Court. It would be open for the petitioner to approach the Civil court and establish his rights in regard to the property.
In this view of the matter, no interference is called for in the instant Writ Petition. Writ petition is disposed of.
( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
aaa/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Writ Court can interfere based on revenue entries regarding title to immovable property.
ASHOK SHRIDHAR PARATHE
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BEED
R. M. BORDE
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
