Petitioner sought implementation of Government order for release after 14 years of imprisonment. Bench directed response based on Supreme Court interim order in V. Sriharan.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
373.15crwp
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
______________________________________________________ CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 373 OF 2015
DILIP PANDHARI JAMBULE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Petitioners (Through Jail): Mr.Gaikwad Satish A. ( Appointed) APP for Respondents/State: Mr.A.V. Deshmukh.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ. Dated: AUGUST 01, 2015
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. He invited our attention to the order passed by the Home Department, Government of Maharashtra dated 19th July, 2014. He submits that the concerned department has already passed the order thereby ordering release of the petitioner on completion of fourteen years actual imprisonment. It is due to an interim order passed by the Apex Court not to grant remission during the interregnum, the said order was not acted upon. He seeks direction for implementation of the said order in the light of the order passed by the
373.15crwp
2
Supreme Court dated 23rd July, 2015 in Writ Petition (CRL.) No.48 OF 2014 (Union of India vs. V. Sriharan @ Murugan and ors.) modifying the earlier interim order dated 9th July, 2014, by which the State Governments were restrained from exercising power of remission to life convicts.
2 In the light of submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the interim order dated 23rd July, 2015 in case of V. Sriharan @ Murugan and ors. (supra), we direct the respondents to take an appropriate decision, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of four weeks from today.
The High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Aurangabad to pay professional fees to the learned Counsel (appointed) for the petitioner, as per schedule of fees. Petition stands disposed of, accordingly.
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J)
(S.S. SHINDE, J)
kadam/
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition (CRL.) No.48 OF 2014 (Union of India vs. V. Sriharan @ Murugan and ors.)Referred¶15
DILIP PANDHARI JAMBULE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
