Mahadev Balu Giri v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
315.15crwp
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
______________________________________________________ CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 315 OF 2015
MAHADEV BALU GIRI VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
... Advocate for Petitioner (Through Jail): Mr.S.A. Nagarsoge (appointed). APP for Respondents/State: Mr.B.L. Dhas.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ. Dated: AUGUST 01, 2015
Heard.
2 It is the contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was convicted for the offence punishable u/s 302 and 498-A of IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment vide order dated 24.03.1999 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Kolhapur. It is claimed that the petitioner has completed more than 14 years actual imprisonment and he is entitled for the benefit of the notification dated 23rd April, 2012 and the provisions of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and
315.15crwp
2
Parole) Rules, 1959.
3 We direct the respondents to consider the prayer of the petitioner and take suitable decision, after verifying record of the petitioner and considering the order passed by the Supreme Court dated 23rd July, 2015 in Writ Petition (CRL.) No.48 OF 2014 (Union of India vs. V. Sriharan @ Murugan and ors.) modifying the earlier interim order dated 9th July, 2014, as expeditiously as possible and preferably, within four weeks from today.
Petition stands disposed of on above terms. Parties to act upon authenticated copy of this order.
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J)
kadam/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment, is entitled to benefit of notification dated 23rd April, 2012 and Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Union of India vs. V. Sriharan @ Murugan and ors.Referred¶16
Union of India vs. V. Sriharan @ Murugan and ors., Writ Petition (CRL.) No. 48 OF 2014
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahadev Balu Giri
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court