The petitioner society challenged its exclusion from the voter list. The court observed the society was in default with the bank and the District Election Officer acted in consonance with rules, rejecting the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp3720.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3720 OF 2015
AMAR PRATAMIK SAHAKAR GRAHAK BHANDAR MARYADEET, BEED VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Thombre Chandrakant V. GP for Respondents: Mr. D.R. Kale Advocate for respondent No.3: Mr. D.J. Choudhari
CORAM : R. M. BORDE AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 21st APRIL, 2015
P.C. :-
The learned counsel for the respondent No.3 , on instructions, states that the petitioner society is in default of the District Central Co-operative Bank and as such, the name of petitioner society is not included in the list of voters. The action of District Election Officer is in consonance with the Rules and as such no interference is called
for. Petition stands rejected.
rlj/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the exclusion of the petitioner society from the voter list due to default of the District Central Co-operative Bank warrants interference by the court.
AMAR PRATAMIK SAHAKAR GRAHAK BHANDAR MARYADEET, BEED
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER
R. M. BORDE
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
