Petitioners sought leave to withdraw two writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court of Judicature at Aurangabad granted leave and disposed of the petitions as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petitions; disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10847 OF 2014
SIDDHESHWAR RAOSAHEB PATIL AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WITH
WP/10848/2014
JAYMALA W/O VISHWAS PATIL AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. A.S. More AGP for Respondents: Mrs M.A.Deshpande
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: April 20, 2015
PER COURT :-
( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
aaa/-
SIDDHESHWAR RAOSAHEB PATIL
JAYMALA W/O VISHWAS PATIL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDÉ
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
