Partly allowed
Ajit Hariram Lakhani v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/3705/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
907 WP 3705.14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.No. 907
WP 3705.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3705 OF 2014
Ajit Hariram Lakhani ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and 2 ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Nitin Sejpal along with Ms. Pooja Bhojane, advocates for the petitioner.
Mrs. M. H. Mhatre, APP for the State.
Mr. A. H. Ponda i/b. Mr. Hrishikesh Mundargi, advocate for respondent No.2.
Mr. Sudam Kale, advocate for respondent No.3.
Coram : RANJIT MORE &
R. G. KETKAR, JJ.
Date : 1st SEPTEMBER, 2015.
P. C. :
Mr. Sejpal, learned counsel for the petitioner having
argued the matter for some time, seeks leave to withdraw the
petition. Leave as prayed for, is granted. The writ petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
[R. G. KETKAR, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
Shubhada S Kadam 1/1
Ajit Hariram Lakhani
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
RANJIT MORE
R. G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court