The High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that no interference is called for as the election program was at an advanced stage. The option to avail of remedies under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act was kept open for the petitioners.
None. The writ petition stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp3123.15.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3123 OF 2015
Laxman s/o Pundlik Patil
& others .. PETITIONERS
VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. H.V. Patil, advocate for petitioners. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & V. K. JADHAV JJ. DATE : 18th MARCH, 2015.
PER COURT :
8 SCC 509, no interference is called for in the instant petition. Keeping the option to avail of remedies provided under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act open for the petitioners, writ petition stands disposed of.
( V.K. JADHAV ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Laxman s/o Pundlik Patil
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
