Petitioner challenged the proposed expansion of Aurangabad Municipal Corporation boundaries. The High Court disposed of the petition after the State Election Commission directed the State Government to suspend the boundary amendment process.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2994.15.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2994 OF 2015
Vinayak s/o Laxmanrao Hiwale .. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. S.S. Thombre, advocate for petitioner. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & V. K. JADHAV JJ. DATE : 18th MARCH, 2015.
PER COURT :
wp2994.15.doc
2
marked 'X' for identification.
( V.K. JADHAV ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the grievance regarding the proposed change in boundaries of Aurangabad Municipal Corporation deserves consideration after the State Government suspended the process.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vinayak s/o Laxmanrao Hiwale
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
