there are different schemes applicable in respect of different subjects in the matter of allotment of the marks. Insofar as the concerned subjects, namely, basic workshop practice and professional practice are concerned, the college was allotting the marks out of 25 and the marks were to be doubled while being uploaded to bring them in conformity with being out of 50. It is also not in dispute that after the petitioner realised the incorrect uploading of the marks, the Board was requested to correct the same in accordance with the Circular governing the subject. It appears that the Board had imposed a fine of Rs.1 lakh, against the management, as a condition precedent for correction of the results, which has already been deposited. It is also not in dispute that a committee was deputed to look into the matter and for ascertaining the circumstances leading to the uploading of the incorrect marks and the petitioner had accepted her mistake. For the present purpose, we need not go into the aspect of the personal reasons given by the petitioner i.e., being under stress on account of the ill-health of her mother. We find that it is nobody's case that there was any intentional or active negligence on the part of the petitioner in the matter of the uploading of the marks. It is nobody's case that there was any manipulation as such. Undoubtedly, this has to be categorised as a bonafide mistake and although it is bound to result into certain inconvenience to the students/parents, we find that the impugned order
