Allowed

Rajendra Bhilsing Valvi v. State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Rural Devlp. and Water Conservation Dept. and Anr.

Bombay HC21 Jan 2015WP/309/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay, Bench at Bombay heard multiple writ petitions seeking a direction from the Zilla Parishad to decide transfer proposals of Scheduled Tribe employees within a fixed timeframe. The court granted the prayer.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 2, the Zilla Parishad, to consider and decide the Petitioners' transfer proposals within six weeks.

Rajendra Bhilsing Valvi Vs State of Maharashtra… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

ssm 1

¶2

21wp204.15gp.sxw

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 204 OF 2015

¶6

Kalpanabai Prakash Pawar ….Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶7

WITH

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 303 OF 2015

¶9

Baliram Mahadu Bothinge ….Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶10

WITH

¶11

WRIT PETITION NO. 304 OF 2015

¶12

Chandji Sitaram Barage ….Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶13

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 305 OF 2015

¶14

Balaji Babusha Khupse ….Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶15

WITH

¶16

WRIT PETITION NO. 306 OF 2015

¶17

Devidas Parsu Naik ….Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶18

WITH

¶19

WRIT PETITION NO. 307 OF 2015

¶20

Balu Namdeo Gavari ….Petitioner.

¶21

Vs.

¶22

1/3

¶23

ssm 2 21wp204.15gp.sxw State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶24

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 308 OF 2015

¶25

Vitthal Bhaurao Pimple ….Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 309 OF 2015 Rajendra Bhilsing Valvi ….Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶26

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 437 OF 2015

¶27

Ganesh Prakash Pardhi ….Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 438 OF 2015 Sampat Ananda Vasave ….Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

¶28

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 439 OF 2015

¶29

Pundlik Kisan Deshmukh ….Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 440 OF 2015 Sambhaji Suraji Vasave ….Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.

2/3

ssm 3

21wp204.15gp.sxw

Mr. Ashwin R. Kapadnis for the Petitioner in all the matters. Ms. M.S. Bane, AGP for the Respondent No.1 in all the matters.

¶34

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND C.V. BHADANG, JJ. DATE : 21^st JANUARY 2015.

¶35

P.C.:

¶36

Heard.

¶37

The only prayer made by the Petitioner is for a direction to the RespondentZilla Parishad to decide the proposal of the Petitioner for transfer, in accordance with the Government Resolution dated 29.09.2011, from the Scheduled Tribe category within a time frame.

¶38

Since, the prayer of the Petitioners is innocuous and since similar prayers were considered and granted by this Court in Writ Petition No. 3359 of 2014, we intend to grant the prayer made by the Petitioners.

¶39

Hence, the Petitions are disposed of with a direction to the Respondent No.2Zilla Parishad to consider and decide the proposal of the Petitioners in terms of the Government Resolution dated 29.09.2011 from the Scheduled Tribe category, as early as possible and positively within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

¶40

Order accordingly. No order as to costs.

¶41

(C.V. BHADANG, J.) (VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)

¶42

3/3

Rajendra Bhilsing Valvi v. State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Rural Devlp. and Water Conservation Dept. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Bhilsing Valvi v. State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Rural Devlp. and Water Conservation Dept. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gold Mohar Advertising Service (P) Ltd. Vs Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Aakash S/O Ravindra Devke Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 3 Ors.

M/S Lucky Realty Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 8 Ors.

Vitthal Bhaurao Pimple Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Rural Devlp. and Water Conservation Dept. and Anr.

Balu Namdeo Gavari Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Rural Devlp. and Water Conservation Dept. and Anr.

Devidas Parsu Naik Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Rural Devlp. and Water Conservation Dept. and Anr.