Banwarilal H. Saini v. Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax (Assessment) and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner and advocate were absent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
211-WP-2983-05.doc
1
Ladda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No.2983 OF 2005
Banwarilal H.Saini } ..Petitioner. Vs
Assistant Commissioner & Ors }..Respondents.
None for the Petitioner. Ms Madhubala Kajale AGP for State-Respondent.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & S.P.DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 16th JANUARY, 2015.
P.C.
The petitioner and Advocate, both are absent. The names of the
petitioner and his Advocate have been correctly displayed on the board. The
writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
(S.P. DESHMUKH, J.) ( S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J)
LADDA R.S.
1 of 1
Banwarilal H. Saini
Assistant Commissioner & Ors
S.C. Dharmadhikari
S.P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court