The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed a writ petition and notice of motion for want of prosecution, as the petitioner and no one representing them appeared before the bench despite multiple notices after an interim order was passed.
The writ petition and notice of motion were dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
208-WP-2668-05.doc
1
Ladda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No.2668 OF 2005 ALONG WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No.99 of 2006.
Yahoo Web Services India Pvt Ltd. Vs
..Petitioner.
State of Maharashtra & ors ..Respondents.
None for the petitioner. None for the respondents.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & S.P. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 16th JANUARY, 2015.
P.C.
The petitioner and Advocate, both are absent. After the writ petition was admitted and interim order was passed, from 2010 none has appeared to argue the case on merits and finally. The weekly board has been notified by the Registry in the last week. The names of the petitioner and its Advocate have been correctly displayed on the board. There was enough opportunity for parties and their Advocates to remain present to argue the case. Since none are appearing, the writ petition and the notice of motion stand dismissed for want of prosecution.
(S.P. DESHMUKH, J.) ( S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J )
LADDA R.S.
1 of 1
Yahoo Web Services India Pvt Ltd
State of Maharashtra
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
S.P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
