The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the withdrawal of free electricity facilities for agriculturists in Maharashtra, deeming it infructuous as the government likely took different decisions and failed to file an affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 247 OF 2007
MAHARASHTRA KRUSHAK SHITWARDHAK SANGHATNA
MUKTAINAGAR, JALGAON
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. A G Talhar AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.R.Palnitkar Advocate for Respondent 2 : Mr. A.S.Bajaj Advocate for Respondent 3 : Mr. Alok sharma
CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: January 15, 2015
PER COURT :-
2. Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. )
aaa/-
Maharashtra Krushak Shitwardhak Sanghatna
The State of Maharashtra
A.V. NIRGUDE
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
