High Court at Aurangabad held that a writ petition challenging 2004 Grampanchayat elections was infructuous as the tenure of elected representatives had expired by the time of hearing in 2015.
Writ Petitions disposed of as infructuous; Civil applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5035 OF 2004
WITH
CA/11190/2004 IN WP/5035/2004
RAHENJA NATTHU PAWRA VERSUS
VIRSINGH PILA PAWRA & ORS
WITH
WP/5036/2004
WITH
CA/11189/2004 IN WP/5036/2004
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. P S Patil AGP for Respondents: Mr. K.J.Ghute Patil Advocate for Respondents : Mr. V.P.Raje h/f Mr. C.R.Deshpande
Advocate for Respondents 7,8 :Kalpana Mutatkar
CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: January 15, 2015
PER COURT :-
( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. )
aaa/-
RAHENJA NATTHU PAWRA
VIRSINGH PILA PAWRA & ORS
A.V. NIRGUDE
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
