This petition challenged an order refusing reservation for promotion for a nurse with disability. The court held that since the identified posts were fewer than seven, applying the 3% cap required no reservation, and dismissed the petition.
Writ petition summarily dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-2469-13.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2469 OF 2013
Smt. Saranga Ramsing Chavan ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and others. .. Respondents
Mr. Pravartak Pathak for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Deshpande, AGP for respondent No.1-State. Mr. M.L.Patil with Mr. V.G. Tadke for respondent No.2. Ms.Nazia Shaikh i/by Ms. Leena Patil for respondent No.3.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. &
B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.
January 13, 2015
P.C.
In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 17 October 2012 of the Commissioner, Directorate, Welfare of Persons with Disabilities, Pune.
1 of 2
srk
wp-2469-13.sxw
CHIEF JUSTICE
B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.
2 of 2
srk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is any infirmity in the order refusing reservation for promotion to the cadre of Assistant Metron for a person with disability due to the total identified posts being less than seven.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Saranga Ramsing Chavan
State of Maharashtra
Mohit S. Shah
B.P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
